
The specialist AEO and GEO agency, with our own AI search monitoring platform.
Focus vertical — E-commerce & Retail.
We track how ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and other AI describe your brand and your products, diagnose what is holding you back in category recommendations, then execute the answer engine optimization work end to end. Built on AI monitoring tool we developed in-house and configured around your category, price tier and competitive set.
Shoppers now ask ChatGPT and Claude which brand to buy before they ever open a marketplace or visit a brand website.
Answer engine optimization and generative engine optimisation are the layer where those category recommendations get formed, and it is the layer where most e-commerce and retail brands have no presence, no diagnostic data and no plan in place. In a category where being absent from the AI answer is functionally the same as not existing, that gap is one of the highest-cost blind spots in retail marketing right now.
You are missing from category recommendations.
"Best noise-cancelling headphones under €200." "Most reliable robot vacuum for pet hair." "Best running shoes for flat feet." "Top sustainable skincare brands." These are the queries that decide which brands enter a shopper's consideration set. The brands that appear in those AI-generated shortlists are the ones that get evaluated, compared and bought. The ones that do not appear effectively do not exist, regardless of how strong their product, reviews or paid media performance is everywhere else.
Your product attributes are described inaccurately.
AI tools describe your materials, country of manufacture, certifications, sizing, ingredient lists and product specifications based on what they have learned, and what they have learned is often outdated, incomplete or wrong. A leather product gets described as synthetic. A product made in Portugal gets attributed to a different country. A certification you actually hold gets left out, and one you do not gets attached to your name. All of this is shaping how shoppers perceive your product before they have ever seen it.
AI is placing you in the wrong price tier.
A mid-range brand gets described as luxury. A premium brand gets bracketed with discount alternatives. AI tools infer price positioning from a mix of signals across your website, retailer listings, review platforms and editorial coverage, and when those signals point in different directions, the model defaults to whichever positioning has the most weight in its training data. The result is that shoppers either see you in comparisons where you are dramatically over or underpriced for the alternatives shown, or they filter you out entirely because the price tier in the AI answer does not match what they are looking for.
The sentiment around your brand in AI answers does not match reality.
AI tools attach descriptors to your brand: reliable, overpriced, niche, trendy, outdated, premium, mid-tier, sustainable, etc.. These descriptors are pulled from the language used about you across reviews, editorial coverage, forums and social conversations, and they shape every recommendation AI makes about you. When the sentiment in AI answers lags behind the brand you have actually built, or when negative descriptors from years-old reviews keep resurfacing, the gap between brand reality and brand perception in AI search becomes a direct drag on consideration.
The signals that decide whether AI recommends you.
E-commerce and retail has a particular set of signals that drive visibility in AI search and the accuracy of how AI describes your brand and products. These are the some of what we track, diagnose and improve through our monitoring platform.
01
Presence in category recommendations.
Are you appearing when shoppers ask AI for the best products in your category, your price range and your use case? Presence in "best X under Y" and "top brands for Z" answers is the most direct signal that your category positioning is landing, and absence here is the most common reason brands lose to competitors that AI search has decided to surface instead.
02
Product attribute accuracy.
Are your materials, country of manufacture, certifications, ingredients, sizing and product specifications described correctly across AI responses? Inaccurate attributes lose sales at the exact moment a shopper is evaluating you against alternatives, and in categories where provenance, certification or composition is part of the value proposition, attribute errors are costly.
03
Price tier and segment positioning.
Is AI placing you in the correct price tier and against the correct competitors for that tier? A premium brand grouped with discount alternatives loses on value perception. A mid-range brand grouped with luxury alternatives loses on accessibility. Price tier accuracy in AI search is the difference between appearing in comparisons that convert or do not.
04
Brand sentiment and descriptors.
What language does AI use to describe your brand? Reliable, premium, niche, sustainable, innovative, dated, overpriced. These descriptors travel with every AI recommendation about your brand, and the gap between how AI describes you and how you actually want to be perceived is one of the most under-monitored and high-leverage areas of GEO in retail.
05
Competitive set accuracy in comparison queries.
When shoppers ask AI to compare you to competitors, are the competitors AI picks the ones you actually compete with on shelf, in carts and in consideration? Comparison queries are decision-stage queries, and the alternatives AI surfaces alongside your brand shape the criteria shoppers use to evaluate you. Wrong competitor set means wrong evaluation criteria means lost sales.
06
Share of Voice versus key rivals.
How often do you appear against the three to five competitors who matter most in your category and price tier? Share of Voice in AI search is the most direct read on how likely you are to be recommended, and it tends to be a leading indicator of category-level demand a quarter or two ahead of marketplace and direct-to-consumer revenue.
A monitoring platform built around your category and price tier, not a generic template.
We built our own AEO monitoring platform in-house, and we configure it around your product range, category, price tier, competitive set, positioning and the queries your shoppers actually run. The competitors we track are the ones you actually compete with at your price point, and the metrics we surface map to how AI search visibility translates into traffic, consideration and conversion in your specific niche.
We are a full-cycle agency, which means we do not hand over a dashboard and walk away. We analyse, we diagnose, we build the roadmap and we execute, either alongside your team or as a fully outsourced function.
Custom prompt library.
Tell us the categories, price tiers and shopper scenarios you want to monitor. Generate prompts automatically and pick the ones that fit, or upload your own. You get a fully configured AEO monitoring dashboard built around the products and shopper queries that matter to your business, not a default one.
Configurable Niche metrics.
Mention Rate, Share of Voice, Average Rank, Category Recommendation Presence, Attribute Accuracy Score, Sentiment Tracking, Price Tier Accuracy, GEO Score and several others, all weighted and reported against the goals you care about. The dashboard is customisable from the ground up.
Adjustable competitor lists.
Nobody knows your real competitor set better than you do, and AI knows even less than that. You can adjust the brands you want to monitor and benchmark against at any time, segmented by category and price tier, on your terms and at the cadence that suits your retail calendar.
Full setup support by our team.
As a full-cycle AEO and GEO agency, we are involved from step zero. We set the tool up, tailor it to your category, and guide you through prioritising the GEO initiatives that will move the needle first. Execution can run with your team, with ours, or with a blend of both, depending on the setup you have in-house.
Execute with your team or with our support, depending on your internal capabilities.
We adapt monitoring and AEO implementation to your category, internal metrics, and workflows.
We adapt monitoring and implementation to your category, your internal metrics and the workflows your team already uses. Strategy, execution and our in-house monitoring platform run as one engagement, so the work shows up in AI search visibility you can actually measure.
4 STEPS
AEO monitoring,
Monitor AEO – if & how you appear in AI search:
-
mention rate and share of voice,
-
category presence,
-
brand attribute signals,
-
price tier positioning,
-
materials and certifications
-
brand & source co-occurrence,
-
your brand GEO score & dynamics,
-
& any other tailored criteria.
Learn how AI systems describe:
-
your product & pricing perception,
-
product fit,
-
price and value,
-
availability,
-
materials/certifications,
-
delivery and returns,
-
shopper fit.
1
GEO readiness,
Analyse your GEO readiness:
-
own resources programming layer,
-
own resources content layer,
-
third party presence across retailers, review platforms, editorial coverage and shopper forums,
-
citations.
Check competitor visibility:
-
who gets recommended,
-
in what contexts,
-
with which attributes,
-
how positioning changes over time.
Understand which sources influence AI outputs:
-
retailer listings,
-
review platforms,
-
editorial and category media,
-
your own product pages,
-
review platforms, etc.
2
-
quick-win identification,
-
authority signal prioritization,
-
attribute and price tier corrections,
-
content and category-page changes,
-
external visibility opportunities,
-
phased execution framework,
-
our team support,
-
dynamics tracking.
Get a 90-Day GEO Roadmap.
3
-
website & semantic structure recommendations,
-
product detail page and category page optimisation,
-
documentation and shopping-feed improvements,
-
review platform visibility,
-
an AI-oriented content strategy,
-
content production and placement,
-
content creation & placement automation,
-
external mentions & authority building,
-
competitive positioning optimisation.
Enjoy Generative Engine Optimisation Support
4
What GEO fixes look like in practice.
These are the patterns that come up repeatedly across e-commerce and retail engagements. The specifics shift from category to category, but the mechanics behind the fix stay consistent.
"We never appear when shoppers ask AI for the best products."
Building category presence.
GEO Fix:
When brand signals are scattered across product, lifestyle and editorial contexts with no consistent category language, language models default to leaving the brand out of category-specific recommendations. The fix involves building dedicated category landing pages, publishing comparison content targeting high-intent prompts, expanding coverage in category-specific editorial media and reinforcing category signals across retailer and review platform listings.
What to expect: category presence builds gradually as consistent signals accumulate across owned and external sources. Brands starting from near-zero typically see measurable improvement in AI-generated shortlists within eight to twelve weeks.
"ChatGPT is describing our materials and certifications incorrectly."
Fixing product attribute signals.
GEO Fix:
Thin product detail pages combined with inconsistent retailer listing attributes give AI models little reliable data to draw from. When certifications are buried in legal copy rather than surfaced as citable content, language models fill the gaps with inferred information from competitor pages and outdated archived content. The fix involves rebuilding product detail pages with structured attribute blocks, refreshing retailer listings and surfacing certifications as prominent citable content.
What to expect: attribute descriptions in AI responses improve as the structured content gets indexed and picked up by external sources. Six to eight weeks is a typical window for the correction to become visible in monitored responses.
"AI keeps placing us in the wrong price tier."
Correcting price tier positioning.
GEO Fix:
Tier misclassification usually has two sources: editorial coverage that historically positioned the brand against higher-priced rivals and retailer listings that do not reflect current pricing strategy. The fix involves aligning positioning language across owned and external surfaces, publishing comparison content against the correct tier of competitors and updating retailer and review platform descriptions
What to expect: tier positioning in AI responses improves as the updated signals replace older editorial and listing data. The shift tends to take eight to ten weeks and becomes more stable as comparison content accumulates
"The sentiment in AI answers about our brand is years out of date."
Refreshing brand sentiment.
GEO Fix:
Outdated descriptors from old product cycles and historical reviews tend to dominate AI outputs when recent content is thin or not reaching the sources language models cite. The fix involves refreshing review platform presence with current customer voice, working with editorial partners on updated brand coverage and publishing current-cycle content that surfaces new descriptors prominently.
What to expect: brand descriptors shift toward current reality as refreshed content displaces older sources. Sentiment changes are among the slower fixes to take hold, typically twelve weeks or more, and require consistent reinforcement across multiple channels to stick.
Who we work with:
Our AEO and GEO work spans direct-to-consumer brands, established retail labels, marketplace-native brands, premium and luxury labels, mid-market category players, value and challenger brands, fashion and apparel, beauty and personal care, home and furniture, consumer electronics, sports and outdoor, sustainable and ethical brands, food and beverage, and specialty retail.
In marketing since 2009. In AI search since it became a category.
Our team has worked with international brands across SaaS, e-commerce, fintech and professional services for over fifteen years, originally as ContActive Tech Communications.

Today, that same senior team applies its strategic and technical expertise to answer engine optimisation, generative engine optimisation, and AI search visibility.